This blog consists of politics, philosophy, poetry, history, science, visual art, music, and my own thoughts. This blog is far-right politically and often focuses on the sublimity and power of absolutist, autocratic, and authoritarian regimes
Reblogged from old-glory  101 notes

The common man wants nothing of life but health, longevity, amusement, comfort—“happiness.” He who does not despise this should turn his eyes from world history, for it contains nothing of the sort. The best that history has created is great suffering. By Oswald Spengler (via ludimagister)

Reblogged from theframedmaelstrom  20 notes

When suprahumanism speaks in the received social language it claims to be, simultaneously, conservative (or reactionary) and revolutionary (or progressive) — for these terms, within the three-dimensionality of historical time, no longer indicate the opposing directions of time’s arrow. The reclamation of a mythical past coincides with a project for the future.

Furthermore, this explains why suprahumanist thinkers and politicians — when they are not fully aware of the historical consciousness animating them — are an ambivalent relationship to so-called ‘tradition.’ They continue to imagine the tradition to which they refer both exists and has significance independently of any choice they may make. An advocated ‘return to tradition’ is actually a choice ‘against the tradition’ affirmed in the social institutions and customs of the mass society in which they live and ‘for a tradition’ already lost or dead — or repressed and condemned to live underground.

The suprahumanist discourse is indeed mythical. Myth, within the suprahumanist worldview, is discourse conceiving itself as originative will. It creates its own language by feeding parasitically on another. A myth emerges when a historically new ‘principle’ appears within a social and cultural milieu that is already informed and conformed — primarily in its language — by an opposed principle. In order to speak the new principle must necessarily borrow from the pre-existing language — a language dominated by another principle, another logos — because it does not yet have a language of its own. Similarly, while employing this received language, the new principle must reject the ‘reason,’ or more precisely, the ‘conceptual dialectics,’ of the opposed logos.

The ‘opposed contraries’ instituted by the previous dialectics [Egalitarian dialectics are based on the following antitheses: Christianity/atheism, communism/capitalism, nationalism/internationalism, right/left, individualism/collectivism, reaction/progress, etc.] are no longer felt as such, but rather as unity and identity — at other times as mere difference, though not as opposition.

All this is evident in Wagner, and even more in Nietzsche —with his proposal to go ‘beyond the good and evil’ of Christian dialectics. Later it characterizes the mental attitude of those German thinkers and political movements included under the label of “Conservative Revolution”…

The ‘mythical discourse’ is, in its linguistic materiality, one from which the new logos is absent, as a principle identified with the new myth. The materiality of the language conforms to another principle and logos — hence, the ‘ambiguity’ characteristic of myth, remarked by a number of thinkers — without having nevertheless individuated its cause — and the ‘irrationality’ that would seem to define myth.

However, if the ‘discourse’ necessarily appears ambiguous and irrational, the myth — related to itself, to its own principle – is in no way so. Its own logos is present not in the materiality of language, but within those who speak and understand it. A myth presupposes the existence of men who, beyond language and discourse, have the means of understanding it. As Meister Eckhart observed: ‘This address is only for those who have already found its message in their own lives, or at least long for it in their hearts.’

If the myth appears to those who participate in it, as consciousness and will of origins, to those who remain ‘outside’ it seems an impossible return to ‘primitiveness.’

The entire suprahumanist field — in its artistic, philosophical and political manifestations — is imbued with this notion: of ‘overcoming the contraries’ or ‘negating the dialectics’ of egalitarianism; of recognition of ‘the people’ — understood in an anti-democratic way as an organic community, as the single and exclusive source of sovereignty; and, simultaneously, of the affirmation of aristocratic values or the cult of the leader. In other cases, heroic individualism and anti-conformism are admired, together with a cult of the community and its traditions. Authority and liberty are no longer considered as opposite poles of the same alternative, but rather as values that may be pursued simultaneously and with the same intensity. Nowadays, the same phenomenon may be observed — for example, in the title of Guillaume Faye’s Archeofuturism, where ‘futurism,’ as modernity and technology, is combined with the promise of a new beginning — one which is imagined with ‘archaic’ traits.

By Daniel S. Forrest, Suprahumanism: European Man and the Regeneration of History (via radical-traditionalism)

Reblogged from 18thcenturylove  192 notes



On this day in 1805 the Royal Navy under Admiral Nelson smashes the combined French and Spanish fleet off Cape Trafalgar. 

Leading eventually to the Pax Britannica and one hundred years of unchallenged British dominance of the seas, the expansion of the British Empire to include nearly 400 million people, and the creation of an “informal empire” of business hegemony. 

Reblogged from chucrutypilsen  17 notes

Arditi holding daggers, a symbol of their group. 
Arditi was the name adopted by Royal Italian Army elite storm troops of World War I. The name derives from the Italian verb ardire (“to dare”) and translates as “The Daring Ones”. 


Arditi holding daggers, a symbol of their group. 

Arditi was the name adopted by Royal Italian Army elite storm troops of World War I. The name derives from the Italian verb ardire (“to dare”) and translates as “The Daring Ones”. 

Reblogged from theframedmaelstrom  30 notes

In nature, in its immanence, here and now, we find on the other hand answers to our anguish: “As leaves are born, so are men. The wind scatters the leaves on the ground, but the forest is green again in spring. So too with men: one generation is born as another is erased” (Iliad, VI, 146). The wheel of the seasons and life, each transmitting something of itself to those who will follow, thus assuring a measure of eternity. By Dominique Venner, The Homeric Triad (via radical-traditionalism)

Reblogged from speculative-evolution  145 notes


Atlantic wolffish (Anarhichas lupus)

The Atlantic wolffish is a marine fish, the largest of the wolffish family Anarhichadidae. The numbers of the Atlantic wolffish are rapidly being depleted, most likely due to overfishing and bycatch, and is currently a Species of Concern according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Marine Fisheries Service. Although it looks fearsome, the Atlantic wolffish is only a threat to humans when defending itself out of the water. Apart from their unique appearance wolffish are distinguished by the natural antifreeze they produce to keep their blood moving fluidly in their very cold habitat, involvement by both the male and female in brood bearing, and the large size of their eggs. Atlantic wolffish use their strong jaws to eat hardshell mollusks, crustaceans, and echinoderms. They do not eat other fish.

photo credits: wiki, wiki, seawater, Jonathan Bird